POISONOUS QUESTIONS FOR EVOLUTIONISTS

By Michael K. Farrar, O.D.
God’s Breath Publications

 

Following is a list of serious and important questions which need to be answered sufficiently in order to accept the evolutionary models which are proposed for an explanation of the origin and evolution of physical matter and living organisms.

 

1. If the First Law of Thermodynamics states that “energy and/or mass cannot be created nor destroyed; where did the universe come from?

 

2. If the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy or amount of disorder in the universe remains the same or increases, how can physical matter or living organisms evolve into a more ordered state or more complex organisms?

 

3. If the Big Bang Theory is accepted as the explanation for the origin of the universe, what caused the Big Bang to occur? Where did the proposed “Primordial Fireball” come from?

 

4. If one accepts the Oscillating Big Bounce Theory as an explanation for the origin of the universe, what is the explanation for the fact that there is not enough mass in the universe to cause gravity to collapse the universe for the oscillation to occur? What facts can explain why the Big Bounce would even occur and not a “Big Crunch?”

 

5. If the Nebular Hypothesis is accepted as the valid explanation for the Origin of the Solar System. Why are heavier elements found in greater concentrations in the planets than is found in the sun and the universe as a whole?

 

6. If the Planetismal Hypothesis is accepted as the valid explanation for the creation of the solar system. Why are heavier elements found in greater concentrations in the planets than are found in the sun and the universe as a whole?

 

7. Why is life said to have originated from “non-life” in a primordial soup if this theory of spontaneous generation was disproved by Louis Pasteur, Spellanzani, Reddy and other scientists?

 

8. Why is the single cell assumed to have so easily evolved from primordially formed monomers and polymers of amino acids when it is such a complex living entity of organelles with the capability of reproduction? The information content in a single cell is 10 to the 20 millionth.

 

9. If “Panspermia” (life deposited on the earth from a meteor) is accepted as the origin of life, where did the life originate from which came from the meteor?

 

10. Why are mutations proposed to be one of the major mechanisms by which living organisms evolve into higher, more complex forms when mutations are 99% harmful to life?

 

11. Why is comparative anatomy and physiology used to explain evolution of related species when it also could be used to explain a common architect or design within nature?

 

12. Why is “microevolution” (evolution within a species) used as evidence that macroevolution (evolution between species) occurs when there is no evidence to make this assumption?

 

13. Why is Paleontology (the study of fossils) stated to support the theory of evolution when the majority of expert paleontologists deny any such statements?

 

14. Why are index fossils used to support the theory of evolution when the theory of evolution is used to determine how index fossils are interpreted? (This is circular reasoning!)

 

15. If younger-aged rock formations are accepted to be laid down upon older-aged rock formations, why are there numerous sites in the world where the order of the supposed geological column is completely out of order?

 

16. If Paleontology is stated to be evidence for the Theory of Evolution, why is there no, I repeat no, evidence of transitional forms between fossil species of animals; not just man, but plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates all show single lineages of species and no transition forms between species in the fossil record?

 

17. If brain size is used as a criteria for the degree of the evolution of man, why did Neanderthal man have a very comparable and in some cases larger skull capacity than modern man?

 

18. If man did originate from a common ancestor with the apes, why can no transitional ancestor fossil be found?

 

19. How can we accept the commonly held theory of evolution of man, when the scientific community remains divided on how man evolved? There are currently over 5 theories as to how man evolved.

 

20. If we accept that life came from non-life, that it evolved by chance into higher forms of life and that man ultimately originated simply by luck, why should we place any value on human life? Why should ethics or morals even be talked about if there is no Supreme Being to hold us accountable? If we are simply here due to chance, where do we get purpose in our lives?